NFTs: Innovation or Illusion? A Legal Perspective on the Future of Non-Fungible Tokens

Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) have evolved significantly since their inception in 2014. Their broader recognition commenced in 2017 with the emergence of CryptoKitties and OpenSea, now key names in the NFT landscape.

By 2024, the NFT market capitalization exceeds $73billion. Despite critical assessments, including Bill Gates’ remark regarding NFTs as “100% greater fool theory”, market forecasts project a value of over $200 billion by 2030. This projection persists even after the considerable contraction in trading volume during the 2022 crypto winter.

Against this backdrop, one must ask: Are NFTs a sustainable innovation, or another transient digital phenomenon?

Regardless of individual viewpoints, NFTs present significant opportunities for creators, investors, and consumers. However, accompanying these opportunities are complex and evolving legal challenges, requiring thorough examination.

Understanding the Defining Characteristics of NFTs

Legally and practically, NFTs distinguish themselves from other crypto-assets through their non-fungibility. An NFT serves as a unique digital identifier recorded immutably on a blockchain. While transferable, it is neither replicable nor divisible, ensuring its singularity and legal distinctiveness. In essence, NFTs function as unique, verifiable digital assets.

Beyond Collectibles: Emerging Applications of NFTs

While NFTs are predominantly associated with digital art and collectibles, their applications are diversifying rapidly:

• Asset Ownership Registers: NFTs can represent tangible assets such as real estate deeds and legal documents. Functioning similarly to traditional registries,they leverage decentralization and programmability to enhance efficiency. ChrisDixon of a16z aptly describes Web3 as “the internet owned by its builders and users, orchestrated with tokens”.
• Gaming and Engagement: NFTs are increasingly integrated into gaming ecosystems to incentivize achievements and enhance engagement, exemplified by Pokémon GO-style interactions.
• Digital Identities: Platforms such as Ready Player Me are utilizing NFTs to establish verifiable, interoperable digital identities across virtual environments.

Each of these use cases introduces both new opportunities and significant legal considerations.

Fractionalization and Regulatory Complexity

Recent trends towards the fractionalization of NFTs, wherein a single token is divided among multiple owners, pose serious legal questions. This practice undermines the core principle of non-fungibility and aligns fractional NFTs more closely with fungible securities, thus attracting regulatory scrutiny.

According to the EU's Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA):

• Authentic NFTs benefit from specific regulatory exemptions (Article 2(3)).
• Fractional NFTs, lacking true uniqueness, do not.

Entities considering fractionalization must tread carefully, given the potential reclassification of these assets as securities.

Key Legal Risks Associated with NFTs

As the NFT ecosystem expands, several critical legal issues must be considered:

• Intellectual Property: Ownership of an NFT does not equate to ownership of the underlying IP. Unauthorized use of trademarks or copyrighted material, as seen in Hermès v. Rothschild, may lead to infringement claims.
• Securities Regulation: NFTs offering dividends, fractional ownership, or investment-likereturns may be classified as securities, subject to stringent regulatory oversight.
• Consumer Protection: The European Union's robust consumer protection framework will likely apply to NFT transactions, mandating enhanced transparency and accountability.
• Tax Implications: NFT transactions may trigger taxable events. Authorities are increasingly vigilant regarding income derived from NFT activities.
• Ownership and Custody: Clarifying the true nature of NFT ownership is crucial. Buyers must scrutinize platform terms and conditions to avoid ambiguous ownership claims.

Conclusion: A Promising but Cautious Path Forward

NFT technology holds transformative potential.However, success in this domain demands proactive legal diligence.

In an environment characterized by regulatory uncertainty and technological innovation, engaging experienced legal counsel is not merely advisable—it is essential.

NFTs may indeed reshape industries, but only those who navigate the emerging legal landscape with care will fully realize their promise.

‍

This article is written by Priit Lätt, Partner at TGS Baltic, and Rainer Urmas Maine, Associate at TGS Baltic. Learn more about TGS Baltic.